After the overwhelming success of the first title, a sequel was born The legacy of Hogwarts was inevitable. There's a very clear market for new adventures in the Wizarding World, and Avalanche Software has capitalized on that by developing the follow-up to one of the best-selling games of recent years.
But one serious obstacle may stand in the way Hogwarts Legacy 2success The first game was a whimsical journey through a full school year at an iconic school, and a big part of its charm was how cohesive it all felt. But with recent rumors that the sequel may embrace the live-service model, there could eventually be controversy that could hinder the sequel's ability to strike the same chord.
![hogwarts-legacy-split-difference-sequel-standalone](https://static0.gamerantimages.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/hogwarts-legacy-split-difference-sequel-standalone.jpg)
Relatives
How Hogwarts Legacy 2 can split the difference between a sequel and a standalone game
Hogwarts Legacy 2 is officially in development, but the second part of the series could work as something between a sequel and a standalone game.
Rumors of Hogwarts Legacy 2's live service could spell trouble for the future of the game
The live service of the Hogwarts sequel may upset existing fans
WB's announcement that it's refocusing on live-action games could be a ticking time bomb Hogwarts Legacy 2. The first game in the series was very much an open and closed single player experience. Fans were shocked that even after the overwhelming success of the title, there was no additional story-based DLC waiting for its time. Therefore, The legacy of Hogwarts was very much a throwback to the old eras in games that coupled with Harry Potter The IP probably amped up fan nostalgia several times over.
The legacy of Hogwarts remains one of the most successful efforts of the SB in recent times. And thanks to the efforts of live service MultiVersus and Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League Leaving much to be desired, it's not unreasonable to think that WB will try to parlay some of Hogwarts' success into a live-service model. And while it may seem like a smart business move on paper, fans aren't thrilled about it, as evidenced by a petition asking The WB to avoid live-action elements in Hogwarts Legacy 2.
The biggest attraction The legacy of Hogwarts was his immersion. From the moment a player first starts the game until they receive the platinum trophy, they feel completely enveloped in the Wizarding World. A common concern among many fans is that the addition of live service elements, especially multiplayer, will negatively affect the Hogwarts fantasy. While the concept of running around these iconic locations with friends seems gimmicky, making it work in an online environment with hundreds of players would be difficult; maybe impossible.
Finding the middle ground might be the best thing for WB Games
Despite the reasoning, the vast majority of the community does not seem to support these changes. Despite an ongoing petition and widespread online sentiment, many fans are adamantly against the idea of a sequel using a live service model. If SB follows through and makes the next one Hogwarts the game is something in the spirit Fate or Suicide Squadit can cause enormous friction in the community and can even be harmful Hogwarts Legacy 2total sales. The best course of action is probably something like a happy medium.
“Live maintenance” doesn't necessarily mean multiplayer, it just means the continuation of the content developed for the game. That's exactly what a lot The legacy of Hogwarts players wanted in the first game in the form of DLC that adds things like Quidditch, more spells, and more side missions to complete. It never happened, but the demand was still very high. If WB plays smart with what type of content it creates for after launch Hogwarts Legacy 2it can avoid arguments altogether.
While fans are understandably wary of the idea of using live-action elements in their compelling storylines, there are strategic, non-intrusive ways to do it. Cosmetic content can provide additional cloaks, wands, and beast companions, for example. The best thing WB can do is a reasonably priced story DLC that offers fans more interactions with the characters they loved so much from the first game. Because story and character were really at the forefront The legacy of Hogwartsand if a sequel is to rely on live-action content, it should ultimately serve the things that made the first game so beloved.