Summary
-
Battlefield 6 will have an SBMM item, but it is not different from the Battlefield 2042.
-
Leading producer David Sirland has caused concern over SBMM that arose after the leakage.
-
The commentators praised the developer's clear answer.
Battlefield Labs was an interesting experiment for electronic art and cubes. Although the test playground for the future unnamed Battlefield party, henceforth, specified as Battlefield 6, is designed than a colander; Developers are likely to receive much more reviews than they would be during the usual development cycle.
Extended Playtest leakage reaction was widely positive, and the veterans of the series that glorify the obvious return of the Battlefield 6. However, the constant topic of skill (SBMM) recently raised its ugly head.
Skill-based rates (SBMM) are a broad definition of contacts that try to place players of the same skills level in the same games. Such a system usually balanced the victory and loss of the player over time. Among the players of the first person shooting, who do not feel that they will need to try to succeed in everyday (without calling) lobby.
SBMM will not be difficult
This dispute has emerged after the Data participant's code that indicates the Skills Based System. The reaction in society was negative. The vocal element of the community is usually against SBMM, even though it is the standard for any other genre.
The indignation caused the response from David Sirland, leading the producer, on the Discord Battlefield Labs server. Tych sought to convey to the concern of SBMM, saying that although it would be a quarrel factor, it would be a lesser priority than ping, and the amount of time needed to create a game.
[Battlefield] In accordance with this definition of 2042, there is SBMM – this is what I tried to show the above in detail. It has a skill factor, it is used, but ping and the time to the game – the main priority, and in the game 64 player our desire – spawning a server that begins as soon as possible – thus, skills skills are insignificant in terms of server sorting. Also with a party that is more ignored. Only for clarity – saying that SBMM is not very useful. What you really want to say is “a heavy SBMM where skill separation is a priority, it's bad.”
But it does not make skills as a factor in lump with poor wholesale sales, on the contrary, we need the value of skills to make balanced teams – regardless of the range ranges on the server. It wouldn't be fun if all the players of the high skills were on the same team, right?
Just to reassure this thing that falls – what the value of the skill in the matchmaker (it was there, since we started to face BTW) – does not mean that we are going with a heavy SBMM solution. On the contrary, Battlefield at best when you play all war with friends and different types of players – we don't want to limit it.
All this is also true (the skill is important to balancing the team), no matter how you join the server for reference, did you feel that playback BF Labs were heavy SBMM? No? Then we are good. This is the same matchmaker and settings we will use (with settings if we find any problem, of course). “
In the subject of Reddit on Sirland's response, commentators praise his clear explanation for how SBMM will join the Battlefield 6 section. Others ask for a server browser, that is, the opportunity to view and join custom games.
Battlefield 6 does not currently have a release date, but recent comments of Chief Executive Director Andrew Wilson believe that the game may arrive by 2026 to avoid collision with Grand Theft Auto 6.
